Home » Index » The Sequester: What Does $85 Billion in 7 Months Look Like?
The Sequester: What Does $85 Billion in 7 Months Look Like?
Under the mandatory budget cuts known as the sequester, federal government agencies must cut $85 billion from the 2013 budget effective March 1.
Right-wing pundits tell us it won’t be that bad, and that if it is, it’s only because President Obama wants to hurt the middle class as a political ploy.
They say the president will cut TSA and Customs workers just to annoy us by making us wait in long lines and miss flights. And President Obama will choose to furlough USDA inspectors so that we all pay more at the grocery stores. And, yes, they accuse him of cynically using servicemembers as props when he talks about potential defense cuts at a shipyard.
The problem with their spin is the reality that agencies face.
For example, at the USDA Food Safety Inspection Service, 88 percent of its total funding goes to salaries and benefits for frontline inspection personnel, and the sequester requires the agency to reduce its budget by more than it can save without cutting inspectors.
So, obviously, it’s not the president’s choice to cut food inspectors. The agency will have to so to meet the sequester requirements.
And that means some facilities will lose working hours, because if a USDA inspector doesn’t show up at a meat processing facility, it can’t open. In turn, prices will be raised for all consumers.
Over at the Defense Department, if it furloughed every one of the 800,000 civilian employees for the maximum time it can legally do so, the DOD would save only $5 billion out of the $46 billion it must cut under sequester. So the Pentagon must make more cuts — and that will affect our national security.
In total, sequester cuts will cause 750,000 lost jobs by the end of 2013, according to estimates by the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office.
So far, the Republicans would rather that happen, risking another economic crash, than work with Democrats to close tax loopholes and make sure the super-rich are paying their fair share.
Here are 10 other ways the middle class, the elderly and the most vulnerable will be affected by sequester.
FEMA’s Disaster Relief Fund will see over $1 billion in cuts, affecting those still recovering from Hurricane Sandy, the tornadoes in Tuscaloosa and Joplin, and other major disasters across the country.
Spending on special education programs will be reduced by more than $950 million, affecting 30 million children — and the thousands of teachers, aides and staff who serve special needs kids.
Cuts to the immunization program that provides vaccines to the underinsured will leave 200,000 fewer children vaccinated.
Schools serving more than a million disadvantaged students will lose $725 million in subsidies.
A $400 million cut to Head Start will reduce services for some 70,000 kids in the preschool program.
A $600 million cut from the FAA budget means the closing of some smaller, mostly rural, air traffic control towers.
Some $180 million cut from the Low Income Home Energy Assistance Program will mean 400,000 households losing aid for home heating.
Cutting assistance provided through the Housing Choice Voucher Program to 125,000 puts many elderly and disabled at risk of homelessness.
Cutting emergency and temporary shelter aid to 100,000 homeless and formerly homeless people, the majority of whom are families, disabled adults or veterans, also puts them at substantial risk of returning to the streets.
Some 20,000 jobs lost in university and other labs carrying out research funded by the NIH will affect medical research like that into new cancer drugs and better flu vaccines.
Sign Up
Join more than 100,000 21st Century Democrats online
Donate
Make a contribution today to 21st Century Democrats
Listen
Tune into AmericasDemocrats.com, the weekly netcast for stand-up Democrats
At the center of Bill Halter’s campaign for Governor of Arkansas is his progressive proposal to pay for college for every eligible high school student in… Read More »
Race Outcome: Won According to independent polls, Democratic Representative Martin Heinrich has a good lead over opponent Heather Wilson in the race to replace New… Read More »
Race Outcome: Won Missourian Todd Akin’s views on “legitimate rape” took center stage in the New York 24th District rematch between Tea Party Republican Ann… Read More »
Race Outcome: Won In 2010, Tea Party momentum won Republican Scott Brown the special election to replace the late Senator Ted Kennedy. Two years later,… Read More »
Race Outcome: Won When Rick Nolan represented Minnesota’s 6th District for three terms, former Representative Jim Oberstar called him “the conscience of the Congress.” While… Read More »
Race Outcome: Defeated In a bit of redistricting chaos, two incumbents are battling it out for Ohio’s 16th District, Democrat Betty Sutton and Republican Jim… Read More »
Race Outcome: Won Fresh off of leading 26 states in the fight against Citizens United, Montana Attorney General Steve Bullock faces GOP Representative Rick Hill in the… Read More »
Race Outcome: Won In New Hampshire’s 1st District, Carol Shea-Porter may have picked up momentum recently in her rematch with Tea Party Representative Frank Guinta,… Read More »
Race Outcome: Won Known for his pull-no-punches style when he represented Florida’s District 9 in the U.S. House, Former Representative Alan Grayson’s return to the campaign trail… Read More »
Race Outcome: Won Kirsten Gillibrand staying in the U.S. Senate is critical for keeping the Senate in Democrats’ hands. A rising star in the Democratic… Read More »
Race Outcome: Won Sherrod Brown’s long record of fighting for collective bargaining rights for working Americans and against corporate tax loopholes that help companies ship jobs… Read More »
Race Outcome: Won While Jon Tester’s opponent actually caucuses with the Tea Party in Congress, Tester’s real opponents this year are the Koch brothers and… Read More »
As we enter a new year full of opportunities to advance the progressive agenda, we want to take stock of what we accomplished together in 2012. Whether campaigning for candidates or organizing around an issue, our success comes from the dedication and energy of 21st Century Democrats' supporters working together. [more]